Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Lost in translation?

September 30th 2008 07:24
Review

Hungarian director, Attila Gigor's movie: A Nyomozo (The Detective) about a pathologist who becomes both the detective and the perpetrator in a murder could have been a decent crime movie of black humor.

Did I interrupt something, Malkav?


Or is it actually good? Foreign critics who saw the movie on film festivals (Karlovy Vary) praised it's wit, humor and dark mood. Sounds fine. It won several local awards in Hungary. Ok, they could be biased. So what's the real and honest deal about it?

The plot is a decent, however not revolutionary story about 37 year old Tibor Malkav (played by Zsolt Anger), a forensic pathologist who lives a dull life with stoic calmness. He's not good with words, nor with women. He has a faint love interest in the form of a waitress, but actually, he's not sure about what he feels. His mother is in hospital with fatal cervic cancer, and he has no clue how to pay the expensive operation that could save her. The clinic that could do the miracle is in Sweden, so there's a language barrier as well.

So are we going to the movies?


In this dire situation comes Cyclops, a shady figure with a milky left eye. He offers him more than enough money to save his mother. He just has to use his everyday tools: scalpel and chisel. The problem is that the subject is living and breathing Ferenc Szirmai, who obviously is not willing to be dissected. Tibor takes the assignment after like a minute of hesitation and does the dirty job at night. A stranger comes, a stranger goes, no problem.

Baaad idea to walk around here...


The first twitch in the matrix comes the next day when he receives a letter from a certain Ferenc Szirmai, who states that he is his distant and to this day unknown half brother from a common father. The following river of good old shite takes Tibor through cops, newfound relatives and shady figures of this twisted story on an investigation that rushes towards doom.

Technically and in style the movie has some interesting imaginary scenes when Malkav visualizes vividly about written words, letters from his half brother, his father or the swedish clinic. The photography has some nice moments to it, but the copy I saw was grainy as hell, like they've copied it to a DVD before blowing it up again on 35 mil. Overall I would give the looks a B minus.

Having said that, you might ask: what is the problem with it? Could be interesting! Yes and no. It is interesting, the plot is somewhat decent, there are shining moments of dark grisly humor, and odd characters. The real problem lies in two factors that are benevolently obscured by translation: acting, and dialogue. Some lines made me scrape the armrest, while a large part of the acting, more precisely the delivery of lines just formed silent words in me: "what the hell... no!" It is even more obvious when the one or two actors come on screen who can deliver their lines naturally. The contrast is blinding. Unfortunately they are not the main players.

The whole family in an imaginary scene.


How could this happen? The lead, Zsolt Anger is a decent voice over actor, heard him before, he is good. Could it be the different environment that confused him? Ok, but what about the others? I think the problem is twofold: poorly written dialogue and not enough takes of scenes or the lack of direction in the acting. The result, sadly, is a spoiled movie that could have been good.

The funny thing is that these factors are eliminated for non-hungarian speaking viewers, hence the good foreign reviews, and the reason why I'm still recommending it to you, who don't speak hungarian: go grab it on dvd or any other source, because otherwise it's an interesting, quirky, dark funny crime flick. Enjoy the benefits of it being lost in translation!

Director: Attila Gigor
DoP: Mate Herbai
Cast: Zsolt Anger, Judit Rezes, Sandor Terhes, Ildiko Toth, Eva Kerekes, Zsolt Zagoni
Production company: KMH Film
Producer: Ferenc Pusztai
Co-Producer: Martin Persson, Tomas Eskillson, Macdara Kelleher
Script: Attila Gigor
Year of production: 2008
Original language: Hungarian
Genre: thriller
Length: 107 mins
Release date (Hungary): 2008. october 2.
Sound system: DSR 5.1
Aspect ratio: 1:1,85

Distributor: Budapest Film
34
Vote
Shared on
   


In Bruges

June 2nd 2008 18:27
Review

In Bruges (2008)

Writer/Director Martin McDonagh's (Six Shooter) second film, In Bruges is a witty and sharp movie hoovering on the borderline of dark comedy and intense thriller. Definitely a must see for the not too squeamish with a twisted sense of humor.

A sleepy town with frustrated hitmen


Ken (Brendan Gleeson) the stoic bear of a man and Ray (Colin Farrell) the buzzing rookie are hitmen from London who blew their last assignment, they blew it badly. Their boss Harry, a scary man with a bad temper (Ralph Fiennes) sends them to Bruges into hiding until the storm lulls after the trouble they stirred. If you might wonder where the hell Bruges is, it's in Belgium, but you won't be alone with your dilemma. Our main guys (hero would be a bit far fetched) wonder about the same thing, especially Ray: what the hell are they doing in f'in Bruges?

Two weeks here? Are you serious?


The beautiful but absurdly boring town soon turns out to be close to something that could be called Hell on Earth. It turns out that they have an assignment here, with an unusual victim. To keep off spoiler territory, I'll leave it up to you to find the rest out.

The movie's strong point lies in the dark humor, and the fact that real drama is woven into the story with elegant ease. As a mainly character driven film, the performances are crucial, and luckily they not only don't fail, but some are career highpoints for the actors. Colin Farrell is a talented young actor, but here he can truly show off his skills as the troubled, energetic and unsure guy, who finds an excellent partner in Brendan Gleeson's Ken, a calm fatherfigure, who's almost too good to be a cold blooded murderer. When at over halftime, Ralph FIennes' character, Harry gets a face to the creepy voice, he falls in line with the two main characters in the blink of an eye. As the final dramatic scenes unfold, with both oddly funny and sad tones the same time, the viewer is left with mixed emotions. A feature that is rarely achieved.

Harry chooses a weapon


Slow buildup, good character portrayal, humor dark as night and sudden bloody, violent eruptions. This sums it up, and that's not necessary a bad thing. Definitely a recommended flick that you should check out whether at a special screening or on DVD/BluRay. More movies like this please!

53
Vote
Shared on
   


Review

Need to show more on a poster? I don't think so...


Indiana Jones and The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull


So did the critics at Cannes boo it, or what? The reports are conflicting. Actually it doesn't mean that much. There will be two people watching this film, regular Joes and Jills, who are not really into this whole Indy stuff, and of course the Indy fanatics. Like me.

Can I write an objective review after this? Not a chance, but I'll try nevertheless. I'll try to be relatively spoiler-free, so here's a quick summary of the story.

It's 1957, circa two decades after the period of the first three movies, and Henry (Indiana) Jones Jr. is in trouble again. This time his adversaries are the soviets, mostly mean looking KGB agents, and a sexy-deadly Irina Spalko, portrayed by the brilliant Cate Blanchett. What are they after? Not a big secret: a Crystal Skull. Discovering it's origins and purpose, I'll leave it up to you to discover. Some old and new characters show up, like Mutt Williams (Shia LaBeouf) a youngster playing a badboy image, who becomes Indy's sidekick, and to have a slight spoiler, Marion Ravenwood (Karen Allen) reappears from the great archeologist's past.

After this utterly minimalistic story-hint, let's look at the pictures merits and flaws. The first huge merit is of course that it's an Indiana Jones movie by Steven Spielberg and George Lucas. The second, but perhaps the most important part is, that they did not forget how to make an Indy movie. Having said that, I mean that it has the action, the adventure, the unique humor, the struggling, but finally overcoming aspect we love so much, and quite a few creepy-crawly moments, to quote Mr. Lucas.

In a way it feels like a combination of the three previous movies. It has the BIG secret, and power of the Ark, the creepy and dark moments of Doom, and a certain pleasing aspect of Crusade, that would be a spoiler mentioning it. You will see, and will probably recognize it. A slight hint: it involves two characters and the chemistry between them.

Umm... what to do now?


With a comfortable 2 hours, the movie has a few slow periods, especially in the middle. These are utterly enjoyable though, but mostly for Indy fans. It's also a bit unusual to see Harrison Ford portray Prof. Jones after more than two decades. Interestingly, as the picture advances, you get to used to his new, older image, and he even looks like he's rejuvenating throughout. Maybe a side effect of that sip from the Grail?

What stood out for me, is that the movie has freshness to it. New jokes, and adventures, and most importantly new ideas, so it's definitely not just a mixture of old ingredients. Steven Spielberg still knows how to direct, no doubt about it.

And here's one of the first TV spots, with critics responses, for you who crave for more spoilers.

72
Vote
Shared on
   


U2 can be there!

March 29th 2008 17:08
10th of April, 2008. Remember that date. On that day U2 will start it's tour in Australia. Good news, eh? Not only that but they will hold multiple concerts around the country in different places, all at the same time. Oh yes and there will be a couple hundred of them.

You might ask what am I smoking here in the northern hemisphere in the city of Budapest? Well, I don't smoke, but my hair was nearly scorched down a few days ago when I had the wonderful opportunity to witness the magic of these four men: Bono, The Edge, Adam Clayton and Larry Mullen Jr. Oh, let's not forget Catherine Owens and Mark Pellington the directors, and also the wonderful technology of 3D cinema, a big plus also goes to IMAX as it was meant for this kind of entertainment


[ Click here to read more ]
54
Vote
Shared on
   


Bob Kovacs's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Bob Kovacs
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]